Friday, April 30, 2010

The evidence on the islamic bak magic



The proof of the Bak satanism 1) The foot of king abdullah .the saudi king
2) The change of the egyptian and american flags during president obama speech in cairo.
I have that on Tape as well as a DVD full of audio-video proof of the islamic bak magic
During the speech you will notice that inter-change of the flags .sometimes the american flag is the one on the right , sometimes it is on the left . Huge magic .
What happened to people and reporters who cannot notice the elephant in the room .
From george youssef. I introduced the Islamic Bak online in english and in Arabic . Now in chinese language as well .I live in Toronto Canada but originally i come from Cairo Egypt
Thank you for listening and have a good one….. Did you get your film bak yet .Ask your muslim friend for one and do so twice !!!باراك أوباما 1)
  • www.wwthekingdom.wordpress.com
  • www.wwobama.wordpress.com
  • www.aidariyad.wordpress.com
  • for the proof-evidence on the islamic bak magic
  • ميشيل أوباما :عكس الأعلام أثناء خطاب القاهرة بالباك الإسلامي
  • باراك أوباما و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي
  • الخطاب الأوبامي و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي
  • عنوان جورج يوسف
  • georgeyoussef68@aim.com
  • عنوان جورج يوسف
    تساؤلات عفوا مثلية
    George youssef address
    عنوان جورج يوسف-33coatsworth crescent #214,Coxwell, Toronto,Ontario,Canada.M4C5P9.
    Phone:4166863843.
    Thank you for sending me the Proof (s) of the Islamic Bak
    الدليل علي سحر الباك .
    سحر الباك الإسلامي
  • also on facebook and on twitter; only from George Youssef
  • Cell: 4169933563
  • or 4169933982


  • The foot of king abdullah .the saudi king
    2) The change of the egyptian and american flags during president obama speech in cairo.
    I have that on Tape as well as a DVD full of audio-video proof of the islamic bak magic
    During the speech you will notice that inter-change of the flags .sometimes the american flag is the one on the right , sometimes it is on the left . Huge magic .
    What happened to people and reporters who cannot notice the elephant in the room .
    From george youssef. I introduced the Islamic Bak online in english and in Arabic . Now in chinese language as well .I live in Toronto Canada but originally i come from Cairo Egypt
    Thank you for listening and have a good one….. Did you get your film bak yet .Ask your muslim friend for one and do so twice !!!باراك أوباما

The Christian Pak







الخطاب الأوبامي و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي

George Youssef is the Pharaoh. Gamal Mubarak is just a bak. not human


Genocider: Omar al-Bashir’s re-election in Sudan is a farce











Genocider: Omar al-Bashir’s re-election in Sudan is a farce
► Retweet





Share
By
Louise Roland-Gosselin

The international community should not have permitted a man wanted for war crimes to retain power via a rigged poll
Omar al-Bashir
has been re-elected in the first “multiparty” elections in Sudan for over 20 years. Many had hoped these elections would hail the beginning of a process finally bringing peace and justice to Sudan. Instead, they have proved to be nothing more than a way for Bashir to entrench his control and to become the first head of state to be elected while facing charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity from the international criminal court (ICC).
To those of us who have worked in Sudan, Bashir’s conduct is entirely unsurprising. As a master of manipulation, rigging elections presents no great challenge. But what is endlessly frustrating is the role that the international community plays in legitimising this behaviour, once again choosing to believe that Bashir will “come right” despite all the evidence to the contrary.
The fact that Bashir agreed to stage elections at all was perceived to be great progress by the international community, marking the first step on the road to peace and justice as laid out by the 2005
Comprehensive Peace Agreement. This agreement ultimately culminates in a referendum on the secession of the south of Sudan, scheduled for January next year.
For months, it has been clear for all to see that these elections would be deeply flawed. Bashir is a skilled diplomat and was never going to accept a real challenge to his authority. Having firstly undertaken a fraudulent census, which severely under-represented the population of southern Sudan and Darfur and limited access to voter registration, Bashir’s
National Congress Party escalated their efforts further during the election period, preventing opposition candidates from campaigning, rigging the polls and cracking down on civil and political rights.
With
filmed evidence of polling officials stuffing ballot boxes and widespread reports of intimidation of voters, it would have taken a miracle for the NCP not to win. The international community had numerous occasions to speak out, from the manipulated census to the arresting of election observers. But instead, they turned a blind eye, stating that the elections were merely blighted by technical irregularities, yet accepting the results nonetheless.
According to many observers,
including Simon Tisdall, the international community’s position is right. Rather than expecting the elections to be free and fair, we should see them as step in the right direction: a “staging post on a much longer journey”. Therefore, rather than ruffling Bashir’s feathers now, we should congratulate him for how far he has come, in the hope that this will make him more conciliatory when it comes to agreeing border demarcations or oil-sharing revenue with south Sudan.
In theory this argument has its merits, but sadly it lacks any basis in reality. Crucially, this approach fails to take into account the character and track record of the
Sudanese president. This is a man who, since taking power in 1989 in a military coup, has launched militias against his own people and orchestrated civil war and genocide. More than four million Sudanese civilians have been killed under his presidency. He has consistently promised the international community his regime will adhere to a plethora of peace agreements, only to put them aside at the first opportunity. It is difficult therefore to understand why anyone believes a man of this intent and nature would be willing to allow the oil-rich south to secede from his power, whatever the wishes of the southern Sudanese people.
It is also obvious that by permitting Bashir to openly commit electoral fraud without repercussions, the international community is damaging its own credibility, setting a very concerning precedent for democratic transitions across the world and legitimising the use of violence and intimidation. Far from strengthening its negotiating position, this electoral process has exposed the United Nations, the US and the European Union, and it has demonstrated how far they are willing to look the other way to keep Bashir on side. Neither the arrest warrant from the ICC, nor the Sudanese government launching one of the largest
offensives on Darfuri civilians in Jebel Marra since the Darfur conflict began in 2003, have prevented the world from congratulating Bashir for his commitment to democracy in the past week.
Tragically the ultimate victims of this farcical process will of course be the Sudanese people. Speaking to the Sudanese community ahead of the elections it was clear that despite evidence to the contrary, there was still hope that these elections might have provided them with a democratic choice – a right to vote out a man who has systematically murdered their family and friends and destroyed their lives.
But once again the rhetoric of “democratic change” has been meaningless. While the international community now solely focuses on the 2011 referendum, the Sudanese people are left to wonder once again what it might take for the international community to stand up to Bashir and to protect them.
For PDF, Print , Twitt or Share. EthioSun










: Omar al-Bashir’s re-election in Sudan is a farce
► Retweet





Share
By Louise Roland-Gosselin

The international community should not have permitted a man wanted for war crimes to retain power via a rigged poll
Omar al-Bashir has been re-elected in the first “multiparty” elections in Sudan for over 20 years. Many had hoped these elections would hail the beginning of a process finally bringing peace and justice to Sudan. Instead, they have proved to be nothing more than a way for Bashir to entrench his control and to become the first head of state to be elected while facing charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity from the international criminal court (ICC).
To those of us who have worked in Sudan, Bashir’s conduct is entirely unsurprising. As a master of manipulation, rigging elections presents no great challenge. But what is endlessly frustrating is the role that the international community plays in legitimising this behaviour, once again choosing to believe that Bashir will “come right” despite all the evidence to the contrary.
The fact that Bashir agreed to stage elections at all was perceived to be great progress by the international community, marking the first step on the road to peace and justice as laid out by the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement. This agreement ultimately culminates in a referendum on the secession of the south of Sudan, scheduled for January next year.
For months, it has been clear for all to see that these elections would be deeply flawed. Bashir is a skilled diplomat and was never going to accept a real challenge to his authority. Having firstly undertaken a fraudulent census, which severely under-represented the population of southern Sudan and Darfur and limited access to voter registration, Bashir’s National Congress Party escalated their efforts further during the election period, preventing opposition candidates from campaigning, rigging the polls and cracking down on civil and political rights.
With filmed evidence of polling officials stuffing ballot boxes and widespread reports of intimidation of voters, it would have taken a miracle for the NCP not to win. The international community had numerous occasions to speak out, from the manipulated census to the arresting of election observers. But instead, they turned a blind eye, stating that the elections were merely blighted by technical irregularities, yet accepting the results nonetheless.
According to many observers, including Simon Tisdall, the international community’s position is right. Rather than expecting the elections to be free and fair, we should see them as step in the right direction: a “staging post on a much longer journey”. Therefore, rather than ruffling Bashir’s feathers now, we should congratulate him for how far he has come, in the hope that this will make him more conciliatory when it comes to agreeing border demarcations or oil-sharing revenue with south Sudan.
In theory this argument has its merits, but sadly it lacks any basis in reality. Crucially, this approach fails to take into account the character and track record of the Sudanese president. This is a man who, since taking power in 1989 in a military coup, has launched militias against his own people and orchestrated civil war and genocide. More than four million Sudanese civilians have been killed under his presidency. He has consistently promised the international community his regime will adhere to a plethora of peace agreements, only to put them aside at the first opportunity. It is difficult therefore to understand why anyone believes a man of this intent and nature would be willing to allow the oil-rich south to secede from his power, whatever the wishes of the southern Sudanese people.
It is also obvious that by permitting Bashir to openly commit electoral fraud without repercussions, the international community is damaging its own credibility, setting a very concerning precedent for democratic transitions across the world and legitimising the use of violence and intimidation. Far from strengthening its negotiating position, this electoral process has exposed the United Nations, the US and the European Union, and it has demonstrated how far they are willing to look the other way to keep Bashir on side. Neither the arrest warrant from the ICC, nor the Sudanese government launching one of the largest offensives on Darfuri civilians in Jebel Marra since the Darfur conflict began in 2003, have prevented the world from congratulating Bashir for his commitment to democracy in the past week.
Tragically the ultimate victims of this farcical process will of course be the Sudanese people. Speaking to the Sudanese community ahead of the elections it was clear that despite evidence to the contrary, there was still hope that these elections might have provided them with a democratic choice – a right to vote out a man who has systematically murdered their family and friends and destroyed their lives.
But once again the rhetoric of “democratic change” has been meaningless. While the international community now solely focuses on the 2011 referendum, the Sudanese people are left to wonder once again what it might take for the international community to stand up to Bashir and to protect them.
For PDF, Print , Twitt or Share. EthioSun










Dr. George youssef . Address and Contacts.



4169933563
Other:
4166863843
Current Address:
214-33 coatsworth crescent ; Canadaeast york, Toronto, ON, Canada. M4C5P9

martin bashir






















Sunday June 28, 2009
Yesterday, a British journalist paid tribute to Michael Jackson:
“I think the world has now lost the greatest entertainer it’s probably ever known. It is very sad.”
But in 2003, that same man, Martin Bashir, conducted a series of interviews with the world acclaimed King of Pop, who had then become embroiled in scandal, centering around child molestation claims that dated back to 1993.
It was good friend and spoon bender, Uri Geller, who recommended the iconic pop star to the ITV journalist. Bashir proposed that “nothing be off-limits” in this investigation, a proposal that was accepted by Jackson. Little was known that this documentary would soon cause further scrutiny towards ‘Wacko Jacko’, a name that to some, represents the agonizing final part of his life.
Geller considers the recommendation now as a ‘betrayal’, as Bashir’s cunning deception “deeply upset” the pop star. Perhaps one could even go as far as to suggesting that Martin Bashir was the epitome of canny, machiavellian men that played a part in Michael’s downfall, and eventual death.
The first and final parts of the documentary are still able to be viewed on YouTube, with ITV Productions Limited making copyright claims for the rest of the show. Even in these short clips, Bashir’s heartless and ruthless attitude to journalism and sensationalism is revealed, at the expense of the reputation of a man who is labelled, by the man himself, the “greatest entertainer”. And watching the first part of this ITV program, watched by over 15 million viewers in Britain alone, shows Bashir embracing all that Jackson should be remembered for.
One wonders then why Bashir had to bring up and prioritize upon Jackson’s child molestation claims, in an attempt to show the troubled pop star in a damaging light.
“They’re judging someone that wants to really help people” was one of Jackson’s more effective responses, and to me, it really helps justify his actions. Bashir did well to ignore these words, and continue with what can only be described as badger baiting. One must take into consideration – this is a man whose only life has been in show-business.
But that is not the main reason why Bashir’s interview is unforgivable. Watching the last part of the documentary is especially moving, as the ‘King of Pop’ has to explain himself regarding Bashir’s awkward questioning on Jackson’s children. Pleading that ‘love’ is being lost in the world, and his emotion perhaps cites his own childhood woes. It puts clearly into perspective, for anyone with a heart softer than a stone, the reasons for Michael Jackson’s special relationship with children.
So, is this what eventually killed him? A constant loss of trust that disillusioned Jackson with anyone close-by. A source agrees with this statement, which was in the press on Saturday:
“He felt very alone. Michael had no close friends around him and he always harbored miserable feelings with his father. He was always sad that his family was not with him.
“If there wasn’t a doctor with him, or a security team, then it was managers or a lawyer or a publicist. He was never alone. He surrounded himself with people who used him, and he was terribly paranoid about people using him, so he fired staff constantly. It was just nonstop people in and out of his life.
“He loved making music or just singing old songs. Music allowed him temporary peace when he went into his studio. He would relax and open up more.”
It is still, to me, a shame that Jackson’s emotional attachment with something he was never able to have is viewed as something strange and twisted. And I hope the King of Pop, who died on Thursday, will always be remembered as the King of Pop.
Tags:
" sizset="0" sizcache="3" See also:
Michael Jackson’s ‘Secret Boyfriend’ Speaks Out
Michael Jackson’s Songs to be Used in New Cirque du Soleil Show
DR. CONRAD MURRAY REFUSES TO TAKE PLEA BARGAIN IN MICHAEL JACKSON CASE
Michael Jackson Killed Himself –Doctor Claims
Janet Jackson Still Struggling With Michael Jackson’s Death

Mayardit and bashir is unperturbed


Even the most loathsome tyrants are occasionally admired for their charm, their guile or perhaps their intellect. The same cannot be said for Sudan's Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir who heads one of Africa's biggest and potentially richest nations. Part blowhard, part thug, al-Bashir is a graduate of the 'Idi Amin School of Dictators'.
When General al-Bashir seized power in a sudden military coup on 3o June 1989 there were nagging doubts about his ability to take charge of the mammoth war-torn nation. A youthful 42 at the time, he had been one of the key figures in the Sudanese military assault on black southerners.
Sudan is a country divided between mostly Muslim Arabs in the north and Christian or animist black Africans in the south. The southern Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) launched its drive for secular democracy and self-determination in 1983. Since then, the Government (even before al-Bashir became leader) has conducted an all-out war against southern dissidents. Amnesty International estimates ~ million people have died in the carnage while 4.5 million have become internal exiles and another 4.5 million have fled the country.
AI-Bashir was an eager, early player in this mayhem. He was born into a peasant family in the small village of Hosh Bannaga, 150 kilometres north of the capital Khartoum. As a young man he later joined the army and quickly vaulted to the top of the command structure. He studied at military college in Cairo where he also became a crack paratrooper, later serving with the Egyptian army in the 1973 war against Israel. Back in Sudan, al-Bashir led a series of successful assaults on the SPLA in the early 19805 and soon was appointed General - scant 20 years after leaving military college.
Al-Bashir toppled Sadeq al-Mahdi's democratically elected government in 1989 -'to save the country from rotten political parties' as he said later. With the backing of Hassan al-Turabi, the fundamentalist leader of the National Islamic Front (NIF), the General immediately took steps to 'islamicize' the state. Al-Bashir dissolved parliament, banned all political parties and shut down the press. He also stepped up scorched-earth campaign in the south while courting his fundamentalist supporters. All opponents were dismissed as 'agents imperialism and Zionism'.
Like his fellow Middle-Eastern demogogues, al Bashir loves nothing better than a good anti-Semitic rant. He . once claimed that 'Jews control all decision-making centres in the US. The Secretary of State, the Defence Secretary, the National Security Advisor and the CIA are all [controlled by] Jews'. In March 1991 al-Bashir reinstated strict Islamic . religious law (sharia), pleasing al-Turabi who was appointed speaker of the country's jerry-rigged parliament.
But not for long. Jealous of the influential cleric's growing power in the NIF, al-Bashir declared a state of emergency in December 1999 and ousted al-Turabi from the party.
He followed this with showcase elections a year later which he won easily. Not that difficult a feat given that all major opposition parties were in hiding and SPLA-controlled areas in the south didn't take part at all.
Meanwhile, both international outrage and the death toll in the civil war continues to mount. The General's regime has been buoyed by infusions of cash from the petroleum industry which has refused to bow to international pressure and continues to pump oil along a 2,200 kilometre pipeline to Port Sudan on the Red Sea. Al-Bashir shrugs off UN sanctions and the loss of World Bank aid, secure in his new-found oil wealth. Sudan, he crows, has entered 'a new stage. We have learned to rely on ourselves.'
Not quite. There would be no oil money to grease the war machine without the co-operation of a consortium of foreign oil companies led, shamefully, by Canada's Talisman Energy. Arms imports have skyrocketed with the new oil money - as has Government bombing of southern civilians. President al Bashir has openly declared his intention of using petrodollars to win the war. One press report noted that 'troops backed by tanks, helicopter gunships and aerial bombardments are torturing, slaughtering and burning men, women and children in a drive to evict all non-Arabs from oil-producing areas.' To add to Sudan's misery, food shortages, rooted in war and exacerbated by drought, are widespread and a deadly, biblical-style famine now threatens millions.
But never mind. Omar al-Bashir seems unperturbed. While he was bombing his fellow Sudanese citizens in the south he decided to honour his own success. On the tenth anniversary of the coup that brought him to power he decorated himself with a national medal.





Salva Kiir Mayardit and Diasporas




























































































Democracking SPLM leadership: SPLM elects Salva Kiir
The Sudan People's Liberation Movement convention just had to elect Gen. Salva Kiir. Period! Salva Kiir was at the helm of SPLM leadership not because of ambitious reasons but because tragic circumstances that caused the demise of late Dr. John Garang dictated it so. The aspirations of the the marginalised people in South Sudan, Darfur, Abyei, name it, Sudan have to be realised and so Joshua and the promise, Salva Kiir, SPLM and a cause, the New Sudan.
But in the democratisation process of the SPLM convention, some ambitions had wished to challenge the position of the leaderships. Won't name names but their intentions were a public secret and a clear threat and negative role of democratisation on leadership wherever.There seems a moment in building a nation when leadership should prevail over democratisation because leadership is not always about popularity, but like Napoleon Bonaparte would say, a leader is a dealer in hope. And here is the class act. A leader is best when people barely know he exists; Not so good when people obey and acclaim him; worst when they despise him. But a good leader who talks little when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say "We did it our selves" - Sun TzuThe challenge for the New Sudan is beyond personal egos even as the Sudanese Armed Forces wreck havoc in the contested Abyei region and the Darfur. Something must be done differently.
Henry Owera / Salam Taki
Related: , ,

SALVA KIIR and Xinhua

















Chinese Vice President Zeng Qinghong (L) and Sudanese First Vice President Salva Kiir Mayardit review the honor guard during a welcoming ceremony Zeng hosted for Salva Kiir Mayardit in Beijing, on July 18, 2007. Mayardit arrived in Beijing Tuesday for a six-day visit. (Xinhua/Li Xueren)Photo Gallery>>>
BEIJING, July 18 (Xinhua) -- China is willing to help seek an early and proper resolution of the four-year conflict in western Sudan's Darfur region.
"China would like to work with the international community and push for the early and proper settlement of the Darfur issue," Vice President Zeng Qinghong said in a meeting with Sudanese First Vice President Salva Kiir Mayardit here Wednesday.
Zeng reaffirmed China's stance on the Darfur issue and reviewed China's role in pushing for the early settlement of the issue.
China appreciated that the Sudanese government has reached consensus with the United Nations and African Union (AU) on the deployment of a hybrid force of troops in Darfur, Zeng said.
Zeng also hailed the efforts by various parties to promote the political process of the Darfur region.
Mayardit, who is also president of the southern Sudan region, said the north and south of Sudan were both committed to maintaining national unity and reconstruction.
He invited China to participate in the reconstruction of southern Sudan and promote Sudan-China friendly cooperation.
Mayardit appreciated China's positive role in helping resolve the Darfur issue.
Mayardit arrived in Beijing Tuesday afternoon. The six-day visit will also take him to China's financial center Shanghai and southwest China's Chongqing Municipality.

KIIR











Sudan’s Umar Al-Bashir Wins Presidential Election (Correct)April 29, 2010, 1:41 AM EDT
More From Businessweek
Sudan Seeks Government Free of ‘Bickering’ by June, Aide Says
Carter Sees Sudan’s Flawed Vote as Key to Southern Referendum
Carter Says Sudan Vote Is Key to Southern Referendum (Update1)
Sudan’s Umar Al-Bashir Wins Presidential Election (Update4)
Sudan Starts Ballot Count as Bashir Heads for Likely Victory
Story Tools
e-mail this story
print this story
digg this
save to del.icio.us
add to Business Exchange
(Corrects spelling of first name of analyst in third paragraph of story published on April 26.)
By Maram Mazen and Alan Boswell
April 26 (Bloomberg) -- Sudan’s first multiparty vote in 24 years, marred by opposition boycotts and allegations of fraud, returned President Umar al-Bashir and the leader of Southern Sudan, Salva Kiir, to office.
Bashir won the national presidency with 68 percent of the vote, while Kiir took 93 percent in the regional election, the head of the National Elections Commission, Abel Alier, told reporters today in the capital, Khartoum. Bashir, 66, came to power in a 1989 coup and has been charged by the International Criminal Court with war crimes in the western region of Darfur.
“It was always just a matter of what kind of margin he wins by,” Sara Hassan, an analyst with IHS Global Insight, said today by phone from London before the results were announced. “The opposition was divided and it hasn’t been a totally fair campaign.”
The April 11-15 vote was part of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2005 that ended a civil war between Bashir’s government and Kiir’s Sudan People’s Liberation Movement. The next step in the accord is to allow the south to vote in a referendum, now set for January, to decide whether to become an independent nation.
“These elections have given the Sudanese people in general and Southern Sudanese in particular a golden opportunity to decide by themselves who to run their affairs and prepare them to determine their future through the referendum,” Kiir told reporters in Juba, the regional capital, today.
‘Total Freedom’
Bashir’s National Congress Party will work on convincing southern Sudanese people to vote for unity in the 2011 referendum, the president told a rally of his supporters at celebrations at the party’s headquarters in Khartoum. It will respect and support their decision, even if they choose secession, he said.
“We will work so that the people in southern Sudan express their opinion in total freedom, either for separation or unity,” Bashir said. “Then we will respect and commit to the southern people’s decision and support it also.”
As many as 2 million people died in the 21-year war between the Muslim north and the south, where Christianity and traditional religion dominate.
Bashir’s victory was aided by the withdrawal of his two most important challengers, former Prime Minister Sadig al- Mahdi, who heads the Umma party, and Yasser Arman, the SPLM candidate for the national presidency. The ballot papers were printed before their boycott decision.
Arman captured 21.7 percent of the vote, Alier said, while al-Mahdi won less than 1 percent.
Standards Not Met
Observers from the Atlanta-based Carter Center and the European Union said the elections failed to meet international standards. The late arrival of ballots, some at the wrong polling stations, and voter lists with missing names caused delays across Africa’s biggest country.
“Our concerns with these elections go beyond technical irregularities,” Georgette Gagnon, the Africa director at New York-based Human Rights Watch, said today in an e-mailed statement. “Political oppression and human rights violations undermined the freedom and fairness of the vote all over Sudan.”
Opposition parties in both northern and southern Sudan accused the ruling parties of electoral abuses.
‘Hijacking of Sudan’
“These are rigged elections,” Mariam al-Mahdi, the spokeswoman for the Umma party, said today from Khartoum. “It is a new hijacking of Sudan, by systematic rigging by the state.”
Kiir will remain as a vice president in Bashir’s administration until the referendum. The SPLM’s northern sector will join the opposition in north Sudan, party Secretary-General Pagan Amum said April 22 in an interview in Juba, and may eventually emerge as a separate party from its southern section.
Bashir’s government and the SPLM must still negotiate issues such as final north-south borders, responsibilities for paying Sudan’s foreign debt, and how to share oil revenue if Southern Sudan secedes.
Sudan is sub-Saharan Africa’s third-largest producer of crude oil, pumping about 480,000 barrels a day, according to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Most of the fields are in the south.
Under the peace agreement, the two sides split the proceeds from oil produced in Southern Sudan. Currently oil produced in the region is exported north through Port Sudan on the Red Sea.
Ethnic Clashes
The authorities in Southern Sudan also face intensified violence in the region.
A series of ethnic clashes between April 13 and April 21 may have killed as many as 48 people, according to the United Nations.
Clashes in Southern Sudan have killed 400 people and forced 60,000 to flee their homes this year, while as many as 2,500 died and 350,000 were displaced last year, according to the UN.
Bashir’s government is trying to negotiate a settlement with rebel groups in Darfur, where as many as 300,000 people have died, mainly due to illness and starvation, in a seven- year-old conflict. The government puts the death toll at about 10,000.
The two main armed rebel groups, the faction of the Sudan Liberation Movement led Abdel Wahid Nur, and the Justice and Equality Movement rejected the elections and its results.
Now Bashir “is negotiating from a place of strength,” Hassan said, “and obviously this would cause some frustration.”
--With assistance from Alan Boswell in Juba. Editors: Karl Maier,
To contact the reporters on this story: Maram Mazen in Khartoum via Cairo at mmazen@bloomberg.net; Alan Boswell in Juba at aboswell2@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Peter Hirschberg at phirschberg@bloomberg.net.