The evidence on the islamic bak magic

The proof of the Bak satanism 1) The foot of king abdullah .the saudi king
2) The change of the egyptian and american flags during president obama speech in cairo.
I have that on Tape as well as a DVD full of audio-video proof of the islamic bak magic
During the speech you will notice that inter-change of the flags .sometimes the american flag is the one on the right , sometimes it is on the left . Huge magic .
What happened to people and reporters who cannot notice the elephant in the room .
From george youssef. I introduced the Islamic Bak online in english and in Arabic . Now in chinese language as well .I live in Toronto Canada but originally i come from Cairo Egypt
Thank you for listening and have a good one….. Did you get your film bak yet .Ask your muslim friend for one and do so twice !!!باراك أوباما 1)

• www.wwthekingdom.wordpress.com
• www.wwobama.wordpress.com
• www.aidariyad.wordpress.com
• for the proof-evidence on the islamic bak magic
• ميشيل أوباما :عكس الأعلام أثناء خطاب القاهرة بالباك الإسلامي
• باراك أوباما و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي
• الخطاب الأوبامي و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي
• عنوان جورج يوسف
• georgeyoussef68@aim.com
• عنوان جورج يوسف
  تساؤلات عفوا مثلية…
  George youssef address
  عنوان جورج يوسف-33coatsworth crescent #214,Coxwell, Toronto,Ontario,Canada.M4C5P9.
  Phone:4166863843.
  Thank you for sending me the Proof (s) of the Islamic Bak
  الدليل علي سحر الباك .
  سحر الباك الإسلامي
• also on facebook and on twitter; only from George Youssef
• Cell: 4169933563
• or 4169933982
• 
  


• The foot of king abdullah .the saudi king
  2) The change of the egyptian and american flags during president obama speech in cairo.
  I have that on Tape as well as a DVD full of audio-video proof of the islamic bak magic
  During the speech you will notice that inter-change of the flags .sometimes the american flag is the one on the right , sometimes it is on the left . Huge magic .
  What happened to people and reporters who cannot notice the elephant in the room .
  From george youssef. I introduced the Islamic Bak online in english and in Arabic . Now in chinese language as well .I live in Toronto Canada but originally i come from Cairo Egypt
  Thank you for listening and have a good one….. Did you get your film bak yet .Ask your muslim friend for one and do so twice !!!باراك أوباما

The Christian Pak

الخطاب الأوبامي و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي

www.wwthekingdom.wordpress.com

www.wwobama.wordpress.com

www.wwbarackobama.wordpress.com

www.wwcia.wordpress.com

www.youssefyou.wordpress.com

الخطاب الأوبامي و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي

الخطاب الأوبامي و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي

باراك أوباما و دليل سحر الباك الإسلامي

George Youssef is the Pharaoh. Gamal Mubarak is just a bak. not human

http://www.wwthekingdom.wordpress.com/

http://www.wwobama.wordpress.com/

http://www.aidariyad.wordpress.com/

George Youssef

Genocider: Omar al-Bashir’s re-election in Sudan is a farce

Genocider: Omar al-Bashir’s re-election in Sudan is a farce
► Retweet





Share
By Louise Roland-Gosselin

The international community should not have permitted a man wanted for war crimes to retain power via a rigged poll
Omar al-Bashir has been re-elected in the first “multiparty” elections in Sudan for over 20 years. Many had hoped these elections would hail the beginning of a process finally bringing peace and justice to Sudan. Instead, they have proved to be nothing more than a way for Bashir to entrench his control and to become the first head of state to be elected while facing charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity from the international criminal court (ICC).
To those of us who have worked in Sudan, Bashir’s conduct is entirely unsurprising. As a master of manipulation, rigging elections presents no great challenge. But what is endlessly frustrating is the role that the international community plays in legitimising this behaviour, once again choosing to believe that Bashir will “come right” despite all the evidence to the contrary.
The fact that Bashir agreed to stage elections at all was perceived to be great progress by the international community, marking the first step on the road to peace and justice as laid out by the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement. This agreement ultimately culminates in a referendum on the secession of the south of Sudan, scheduled for January next year.
For months, it has been clear for all to see that these elections would be deeply flawed. Bashir is a skilled diplomat and was never going to accept a real challenge to his authority. Having firstly undertaken a fraudulent census, which severely under-represented the population of southern Sudan and Darfur and limited access to voter registration, Bashir’s National Congress Party escalated their efforts further during the election period, preventing opposition candidates from campaigning, rigging the polls and cracking down on civil and political rights.
With filmed evidence of polling officials stuffing ballot boxes and widespread reports of intimidation of voters, it would have taken a miracle for the NCP not to win. The international community had numerous occasions to speak out, from the manipulated census to the arresting of election observers. But instead, they turned a blind eye, stating that the elections were merely blighted by technical irregularities, yet accepting the results nonetheless.
According to many observers, including Simon Tisdall, the international community’s position is right. Rather than expecting the elections to be free and fair, we should see them as step in the right direction: a “staging post on a much longer journey”. Therefore, rather than ruffling Bashir’s feathers now, we should congratulate him for how far he has come, in the hope that this will make him more conciliatory when it comes to agreeing border demarcations or oil-sharing revenue with south Sudan.
In theory this argument has its merits, but sadly it lacks any basis in reality. Crucially, this approach fails to take into account the character and track record of the Sudanese president. This is a man who, since taking power in 1989 in a military coup, has launched militias against his own people and orchestrated civil war and genocide. More than four million Sudanese civilians have been killed under his presidency. He has consistently promised the international community his regime will adhere to a plethora of peace agreements, only to put them aside at the first opportunity. It is difficult therefore to understand why anyone believes a man of this intent and nature would be willing to allow the oil-rich south to secede from his power, whatever the wishes of the southern Sudanese people.
It is also obvious that by permitting Bashir to openly commit electoral fraud without repercussions, the international community is damaging its own credibility, setting a very concerning precedent for democratic transitions across the world and legitimising the use of violence and intimidation. Far from strengthening its negotiating position, this electoral process has exposed the United Nations, the US and the European Union, and it has demonstrated how far they are willing to look the other way to keep Bashir on side. Neither the arrest warrant from the ICC, nor the Sudanese government launching one of the largest offensives on Darfuri civilians in Jebel Marra since the Darfur conflict began in 2003, have prevented the world from congratulating Bashir for his commitment to democracy in the past week.
Tragically the ultimate victims of this farcical process will of course be the Sudanese people. Speaking to the Sudanese community ahead of the elections it was clear that despite evidence to the contrary, there was still hope that these elections might have provided them with a democratic choice – a right to vote out a man who has systematically murdered their family and friends and destroyed their lives.
But once again the rhetoric of “democratic change” has been meaningless. While the international community now solely focuses on the 2011 referendum, the Sudanese people are left to wonder once again what it might take for the international community to stand up to Bashir and to protect them.
For PDF, Print , Twitt or Share. EthioSun










: Omar al-Bashir’s re-election in Sudan is a farce
► Retweet





Share
By Louise Roland-Gosselin

The international community should not have permitted a man wanted for war crimes to retain power via a rigged poll
Omar al-Bashir has been re-elected in the first “multiparty” elections in Sudan for over 20 years. Many had hoped these elections would hail the beginning of a process finally bringing peace and justice to Sudan. Instead, they have proved to be nothing more than a way for Bashir to entrench his control and to become the first head of state to be elected while facing charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity from the international criminal court (ICC).
To those of us who have worked in Sudan, Bashir’s conduct is entirely unsurprising. As a master of manipulation, rigging elections presents no great challenge. But what is endlessly frustrating is the role that the international community plays in legitimising this behaviour, once again choosing to believe that Bashir will “come right” despite all the evidence to the contrary.
The fact that Bashir agreed to stage elections at all was perceived to be great progress by the international community, marking the first step on the road to peace and justice as laid out by the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement. This agreement ultimately culminates in a referendum on the secession of the south of Sudan, scheduled for January next year.
For months, it has been clear for all to see that these elections would be deeply flawed. Bashir is a skilled diplomat and was never going to accept a real challenge to his authority. Having firstly undertaken a fraudulent census, which severely under-represented the population of southern Sudan and Darfur and limited access to voter registration, Bashir’s National Congress Party escalated their efforts further during the election period, preventing opposition candidates from campaigning, rigging the polls and cracking down on civil and political rights.
With filmed evidence of polling officials stuffing ballot boxes and widespread reports of intimidation of voters, it would have taken a miracle for the NCP not to win. The international community had numerous occasions to speak out, from the manipulated census to the arresting of election observers. But instead, they turned a blind eye, stating that the elections were merely blighted by technical irregularities, yet accepting the results nonetheless.
According to many observers, including Simon Tisdall, the international community’s position is right. Rather than expecting the elections to be free and fair, we should see them as step in the right direction: a “staging post on a much longer journey”. Therefore, rather than ruffling Bashir’s feathers now, we should congratulate him for how far he has come, in the hope that this will make him more conciliatory when it comes to agreeing border demarcations or oil-sharing revenue with south Sudan.
In theory this argument has its merits, but sadly it lacks any basis in reality. Crucially, this approach fails to take into account the character and track record of the Sudanese president. This is a man who, since taking power in 1989 in a military coup, has launched militias against his own people and orchestrated civil war and genocide. More than four million Sudanese civilians have been killed under his presidency. He has consistently promised the international community his regime will adhere to a plethora of peace agreements, only to put them aside at the first opportunity. It is difficult therefore to understand why anyone believes a man of this intent and nature would be willing to allow the oil-rich south to secede from his power, whatever the wishes of the southern Sudanese people.
It is also obvious that by permitting Bashir to openly commit electoral fraud without repercussions, the international community is damaging its own credibility, setting a very concerning precedent for democratic transitions across the world and legitimising the use of violence and intimidation. Far from strengthening its negotiating position, this electoral process has exposed the United Nations, the US and the European Union, and it has demonstrated how far they are willing to look the other way to keep Bashir on side. Neither the arrest warrant from the ICC, nor the Sudanese government launching one of the largest offensives on Darfuri civilians in Jebel Marra since the Darfur conflict began in 2003, have prevented the world from congratulating Bashir for his commitment to democracy in the past week.
Tragically the ultimate victims of this farcical process will of course be the Sudanese people. Speaking to the Sudanese community ahead of the elections it was clear that despite evidence to the contrary, there was still hope that these elections might have provided them with a democratic choice – a right to vote out a man who has systematically murdered their family and friends and destroyed their lives.
But once again the rhetoric of “democratic change” has been meaningless. While the international community now solely focuses on the 2011 referendum, the Sudanese people are left to wonder once again what it might take for the international community to stand up to Bashir and to protect them.
For PDF, Print , Twitt or Share. EthioSun

Dr. George youssef . Address and Contacts.

4169933563
Other:
4166863843
Current Address:
214-33 coatsworth crescent ; Canadaeast york, Toronto, ON, Canada. M4C5P9

martin bashir

Sunday June 28, 2009
Yesterday, a British journalist paid tribute to Michael Jackson:
“I think the world has now lost the greatest entertainer it’s probably ever known. It is very sad.”
But in 2003, that same man, Martin Bashir, conducted a series of interviews with the world acclaimed King of Pop, who had then become embroiled in scandal, centering around child molestation claims that dated back to 1993.
It was good friend and spoon bender, Uri Geller, who recommended the iconic pop star to the ITV journalist. Bashir proposed that “nothing be off-limits” in this investigation, a proposal that was accepted by Jackson. Little was known that this documentary would soon cause further scrutiny towards ‘Wacko Jacko’, a name that to some, represents the agonizing final part of his life.
Geller considers the recommendation now as a ‘betrayal’, as Bashir’s cunning deception “deeply upset” the pop star. Perhaps one could even go as far as to suggesting that Martin Bashir was the epitome of canny, machiavellian men that played a part in Michael’s downfall, and eventual death.
The first and final parts of the documentary are still able to be viewed on YouTube, with ITV Productions Limited making copyright claims for the rest of the show. Even in these short clips, Bashir’s heartless and ruthless attitude to journalism and sensationalism is revealed, at the expense of the reputation of a man who is labelled, by the man himself, the “greatest entertainer”. And watching the first part of this ITV program, watched by over 15 million viewers in Britain alone, shows Bashir embracing all that Jackson should be remembered for.
One wonders then why Bashir had to bring up and prioritize upon Jackson’s child molestation claims, in an attempt to show the troubled pop star in a damaging light.
“They’re judging someone that wants to really help people” was one of Jackson’s more effective responses, and to me, it really helps justify his actions. Bashir did well to ignore these words, and continue with what can only be described as badger baiting. One must take into consideration – this is a man whose only life has been in show-business.
But that is not the main reason why Bashir’s interview is unforgivable. Watching the last part of the documentary is especially moving, as the ‘King of Pop’ has to explain himself regarding Bashir’s awkward questioning on Jackson’s children. Pleading that ‘love’ is being lost in the world, and his emotion perhaps cites his own childhood woes. It puts clearly into perspective, for anyone with a heart softer than a stone, the reasons for Michael Jackson’s special relationship with children.
So, is this what eventually killed him? A constant loss of trust that disillusioned Jackson with anyone close-by. A source agrees with this statement, which was in the press on Saturday:
“He felt very alone. Michael had no close friends around him and he always harbored miserable feelings with his father. He was always sad that his family was not with him.
“If there wasn’t a doctor with him, or a security team, then it was managers or a lawyer or a publicist. He was never alone. He surrounded himself with people who used him, and he was terribly paranoid about people using him, so he fired staff constantly. It was just nonstop people in and out of his life.
“He loved making music or just singing old songs. Music allowed him temporary peace when he went into his studio. He would relax and open up more.”
It is still, to me, a shame that Jackson’s emotional attachment with something he was never able to have is viewed as something strange and twisted. And I hope the King of Pop, who died on Thursday, will always be remembered as the King of Pop.
Tags: michael jackson
" sizset="0" sizcache="3" See also:
Michael Jackson’s ‘Secret Boyfriend’ Speaks Out
Michael Jackson’s Songs to be Used in New Cirque du Soleil Show
DR. CONRAD MURRAY REFUSES TO TAKE PLEA BARGAIN IN MICHAEL JACKSON CASE
Michael Jackson Killed Himself –Doctor Claims
Janet Jackson Still Struggling With Michael Jackson’s Death